Welcome to St Helens Connect
![]() |
Welcome to St Helens Connect, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of St Helens Connect by signing in or creating an account. More forums and features are available when you're signed in.
|
Eye sore Buildings
#91 OFFLINE
Posted 21 April 2012 - 07:05 AM
#92 OFFLINE
Posted 21 April 2012 - 03:12 PM
#93 OFFLINE
Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:55 PM
tessmop, on 20 April 2012 - 07:09 PM, said:
I don't think all the houses could have been saved but am sure some could. I cannot remember in detail but the ones where your family lived around Glover St did not seem to bad. I had relatives who lived in Pitt St, the house had one living room, kitchen, lean to on the back with a sink and toilet down the bottom of the yard and two bedrooms. I doubt if renovating it would have been practical to provide a decent sized family home. also a lot of the houses demolished had been privately rented for years and dreadfully neglected. Also Pitt St had three distinct ages of house and all the newer ones were left, one particular block was demolished apart from the last two which had been added on years after the original ones. demolition has been going on since time immemorial too. i suspect that the bottom end of Pitt St was originally Calico Sq and wonder when that and other places like Barber Court were demolished
I dont particularly blame the council or government as surely the intention to give people decent living accomodation is not a bad principle. I agree with the poster above who blames the town planners of the day, were there any nice buildings built anywhere at this time? Thankfully we are now back to building in more traditional styles but to me the vast open areas left by the demolition are completely wasted space. wouldn't it have been better if the houses had just been rebuilt on the same streets but a bit bigger and with gardens.
My point about technology is the chemicals used to inject damp courses etc were not about then nor were power tools in the way they are now.
#94 OFFLINE
Posted 22 April 2012 - 12:31 PM
#95 ONLINE
Posted 22 April 2012 - 05:04 PM
What do you mean it's in the wrong place? Is the map wrong?
I had put a link to a place/building, that I wasn't exactly sure where it was.
People replied, it was the old Sacred Heart School/Daisy Bank Nursery.
But after using Google map etc. I see where it is now. (Thanks Skyman)
I just looked at that link and it didn't show the ad or pic,
but when I looked again, it did, don't know why it's being temperamental?
So I found another link with an ad and pic. Is this the one you mean?
I am more confused now. Please explain.
http://www.novaloca....935?search=true
Edited by Phyll, 22 April 2012 - 05:19 PM.
#96 OFFLINE
Posted 22 April 2012 - 05:14 PM
Click on the spot on the map, change it to satellite view, zoom in and move to the bottom corner and you will see the roof of the old presbytery with the school behind it between Banner St and Manning St
Edited by antonio111, 22 April 2012 - 05:22 PM.
#97 OFFLINE
Posted 22 April 2012 - 07:02 PM
Phyll, sorry about your confusion - probably caused by an excess of link posting
#98 ONLINE
Posted 22 April 2012 - 08:27 PM
I know where it is, been there many, many times.
I just didn't know what Kizzy meant. Thanks Kizzy.
Here's another link for you.
http://maps.google.c...=12,164.94,,0,0
Edited by Phyll, 22 April 2012 - 08:34 PM.
#99 OFFLINE
Posted 23 April 2012 - 09:59 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users















