SKYMAN, on 06 October 2011 - 05:49 PM, said:
another thing i dont agree with is about eight spaces being used for one grave,even though they have been paid for,,?
Don't forget they are buried on top of one another, in years gone by they just used to prod the grave with a sharp stick to see iof there was enough clearance for a burial, now they stick rigidly to the number of interments paid for with I think four as a max.Even using an old grave you still have to pay to have it opened. If they had gone down the route you suggest lots more space still free would have been wasted and lots more money buying additional gravestones.
bridger, on 07 October 2011 - 11:14 PM, said:
I think they must go around and check if there are any flowers on the graves, put a sticker on them and they're onto a winner.
Funny how you never see any stickers on the older grave stones

When this safety checking started a few years ago there were literally dozens of old sandstone stones in the older part of the cemetery with wooden posts and notices attached to them including my gt grandparents, stone erected in 1902! I have posted about this before but think iot is appropriate to revisit. I often wondered why they had such a big stone when they had little money.
I discovered from the online records that they had a firstborn child the year after they were married and she died 6 hours old and was buried in a pauper's grave. I suspect when a second child died they felt by buyiong a big stone would perhaps ease their guilt that the first child's grave was unmarked.
Each Christmas I put a wreath on this grave remembering all the ones whose burial place I do not know and think the stones erected by the 'Friends' gives other people a focal point.
Gone but not forgotten sums it up!
Up till a few years ago when a new inscription went on a headstone following a burial the stone was removed to a monumental mason's, usually the one who had supplied the stone in the first place. in my opinion it was because this happened that the stone was not fixed as firmly as it might have been in the first place