Only having one eye on the TV whilst listening to Catalans v Saints, was it just me who thought the ref gave Wigan everything in the second half?
Or is it just my anti Wigan view?
Pity they lost Briers early doors because he's still a playmaker.
I also thought two of Wigan's tries were dubious?
And Solomona's should have been given.
Wanky can feel justifiably robbed imo.
Welcome to St Helens Connect
 |
Welcome to St Helens Connect, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of St Helens Connect by signing in or creating an account. More forums and features are available when you're signed in.
|
Guest Message by DevFuse
0
Battle of the W's.
Started By Carr Millite, Feb 20 2010 07:22 PM
2 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
-
- MembersD
-
- 10,893 posts
LGBT Liaison Officer
- Gender:Female
- Location:Wigan (Greater St. Helens)
Posted 20 February 2010 - 07:22 PM
#2 OFFLINE
-
- MembersD
-
- 17,002 posts
Elite
Posted 20 February 2010 - 07:38 PM
Not really giving a damn as to who won, I thought it was a superb game. The best I've seen for a couple of seasons. Never even noticed the ref so he can't have been as biased as you claim
#3 OFFLINE
-
- Members+
-
- 568 posts
Resident
- Gender:Male
- Location:gods country
Posted 20 February 2010 - 08:01 PM
Hello Carr millite,i think you must have had two eyes on the radio,solomona,s dropped the ball short of the line,warrington first try was a forward pass,which two of wigans tries where dubious,i thought morley should have been sin binned.the best team won they played for eighty minutes.it was your wigan anti view.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
