Welcome to St Helens Connect
![]() |
Welcome to St Helens Connect, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of St Helens Connect by signing in or creating an account. More forums and features are available when you're signed in.
|
St Helens RLFCtime to get this forum back on track
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 07 February 2010 - 11:27 AM
If that is so, then why did Hull do ok in it?
People need to think before they speak.
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 07 February 2010 - 04:56 PM
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 07 February 2010 - 08:37 PM
I knew it was a bad sign when my team lost the footy.
When they play on the same day (Everton and Saints) it seems like if one wins the other wins.
And when one loses the other loses.
Bad day all round really.
I think they played it for Sky, when did they ever give a toss about the fans.
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 07 February 2010 - 11:51 PM
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 07:10 PM
donkey o'tay, on 07 February 2010 - 11:51 PM, said:
#21 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 07:33 PM
They're valid reasons.
You missed out the crap coaching though
#22 ONLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 08:59 PM
#23 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:07 PM
playing on past reputations ok they are past their best they have been good players but old
players dont fit in with this modern type of rugby.
i feel sorry for all the folk who paid to go in there on saturday they deserve a refund.
another thing i would make a call to meli and tell him not to bother coming back save his self
a journey he did this at the beginning of last season. gripe over.
i hear to-day there is unrest in the dressing room already.
#24 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:10 PM
Alan, on 08 February 2010 - 08:59 PM, said:
It's my take on what's happening on the field at Saints.
It's boring, it's losing us matches and we haven't got the manpower for the style of play Potter seems to be coaching them towards.
He needs to tell Leon to shape up or ship out.
We can't carry passengers.
I disagree with what Brunty says about Meli in his post.
He played out of his skin when he came back late last year.
Who else do we offload? Cayless, Gilmour and Long have gone. KC in his last season and Wello has perhaps one more after this.
It isn't the players who need to change (with the exception of Pryce) it's the way they play which needs to be looked at.
If you have a bag of rice and some milk you make rice pudding not chow mein.
#25 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:20 PM
face it we are struggling already,cunningham should have finished,gardner isnt up to it you say meli
played out of his skin but how many games did he cost us.
#26 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 09:32 PM
I don't understand some of the people calling for Flannery to go either.
He's one of our better players at the moment.
I totally disagree about KC and Gardner too.
Wilkin needs to step up a gear and Roby should be at loose. Pryce would be better on the wing than at No. 6.
#27 ONLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 10:19 PM
#28 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2010 - 11:00 PM
#29 OFFLINE
Posted 11 February 2010 - 11:08 PM
As long as he goes.
And he can take this chap with him.
http://www.thesun.co...t-poll-axe.html
#30 OFFLINE
Posted 12 February 2010 - 11:40 AM
even i spotted that error.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users














